Aimé Pallière (November 17, 1868 – December 24, 1949) was a French writer and journalist, a Noahide practitioner and disciple of Rabbi Elie Benamozegh. In 1928 he wrote a book on the Noahide Laws - The unknown sanctuary; a pilgrimage from Rome to Israel. The PDF Is below. If you are looking for the parts on Noahide Law search "Noach" with a C. His wikipedia is also below.
The unknown sanctuary; a pilgrimage from Rome to Israel
by Pallière, Aimé, 1875-1949; Wise, Louise Waterman
Aimé Pallière ( – ) was a French writer and journalist, a Noahide practitioner and disciple of Rabbi Elie Benamozegh, whose book Israel and Humanity he edited in 1914. Study on the problem of universal religion and its solution.
Preface and edition by Elie Benamozegh, Israel and Humanity. Study on the problem of universal religion and its solution. Foreword by Alfred Lévy. Paris, E. Leroux, 1914.
The Veil Lifted. Paris, Éditions La Bourdonnais. 1937.
The Unknown Sanctuary: My "Conversion" to Judaism. Paris, Rieder, 1926, 229 p.
Bergson and Judaism. Paris, F. Alcan, 44 p. (lecture given to the Chema Israel Association, in Paris, )
The Book of Shabbat: a collection of texts from Jewish literature [collected and translated] by Aimé Pallière and Maurice Liber. Fondation Séfer, 1974, 92 p.
Catherine Poujol. Around the Pallière "case". Debates on conversion between Orthodox and liberal Jews. Jewish Archives, number 35/1, 1st semester 2002.
Freemason blog "The Markland Mason" is so typical of Freemason doublespeak when it comes to the Noahide Laws. The blog ADMITS that the old charges of Freemasonry mention the Seven Noahide Laws but then says that the term Noahide in Freemason degrees has nothing to do with the Noahide Laws of the Talmud and Freemasons are not Noahides. If you see the main article on Freemasonry and Noahide Laws (here) you will see that Freemasons are indeed Noahides. These are typical boldfaced lies from Freemasons on the subject of Noahide Laws and Jews parrot their fibs.
In learning about the birth of the “High Degrees” I found it very interesting that the first mention of a raising actually wasn’t the Hiramic legend that most masons are familiar with.
In fact, in an old masonic manuscript dated back to 1726, commonly referred to as the Graham manuscript, it is the body of Noah that is raised by his three sons, who were in search of a valuable secret:
We have it by tradition, and still some reference to scripture for it caused Shem, Ham and Japheth to go to their father Noah’s grave for to see if they could find anything about him to lead them to the valuable secret which this famous preacher had… For I hope all will allow that all things needful for the new world was in the Ark with Noah.
Now these 3 men had already agreed that if they did not find the very thing itself, that the first thing that they found was to be to them as a secret… They not doubting, but did most firmly believe that God was able and would also prove willing, through their faith, prayer and obedience, to cause what they did find to prove as valuable to them as if they had received the secret at first from God Himself at its headspring.
So [they] came to the grave, finding nothing save the dead body almost consumed away. Taking a grip at a finger, it came away…so from joint to joint…so to the wrist…so to the elbow…so they reared up the dead body…and supported it…setting foot to foot…knee to knee…breast to breast…cheek to cheek…and hand to back…and cried out ‘Help, Oh Father’… As if they had said ‘Oh Father of Heaven, help us now, for our earthly father cannot’… so laid down the dead body again and not knowing what to do… so one said: ‘Here is yet marrow in this bone’ and the second said: ‘But a dry bone’ and the third said: ‘It stinketh’. So they agreed to give it a name as is known to free masonry to this day…so went to their undertakings, and afterwards works stood. Yet it is believed that the virtue did not proceed from what they found, but from faith and prayer.
– Graham Manuscript, 1726
After further study, I discovered that the early masons even considered Noah as a masonic patriarch of sorts. He is mentioned in passing in the Regius manuscript of 1425-50, and again in the Cooke manuscript of 1450 which makes reference to the “Sons of Noah” discovering two pillars after the flood, on which were inscribed the arts and sciences:
Kindly knowing of that vengeance, that God would send, whether it should be by fire, or by water, the brethren had it not by a manner of a prophecy, they wist that God would send one thereof, and therefore they wrote their sciences in the 2 pillars of stone, and some men say that they wrote in the stones all the 7 sciences, but as they had in their minds that a vengeance should come. And so it was that God sent vengeance so that there came such a flood that all the world was drowned, and all men were dead therein, save 8 persons,
And that was Noah, and his wife, and his three sons, and their wives, of which 3 sons all the world came of, and their names were named in this manner, Shem, Ham, and Japhet. And this flood was called Noah’s flood, for he, and his children, were saved therein. And after this flood many years, as the chronicle telleth, these 2 pillars were found, and as the Pilicronicon saith, that a great clerk that was called Pythagoras found that one, and Hermes, the philosopher, found that other, and they taught forth the sciences that they found therein written.
– Cooke Manuscript, 1450
Probably the most prominent reference to Noah would be in the Constitutions of 1738, which refers to all masons as “Noahchida”, the ark as a masonic building, and Noah and his three sons as grand officers:
A Mason Is obliged by his tenure to observe the moral law as a true Noachida..
..NOAH, the ninth from Seth, was commanded and directed of God to build the great Ark, which, tho’ of Wood, was certainly fabricated by Geometry, and according to the Rules of Masonry. NOAH, and his three Sons, JAPHET, SHEM, and HAM, all Masons true, brought with them over the Flood the Traditions and Arts of the Ante-deluvians, and amply communicated them to their growing Offspring.
– Anderson’s Constitutions, 1738
The old constitutions even mention the seven Noahide laws, but actually there is no connection between Noahides and Noahchida. One is a Jewish philosophy and the other is a poetical reference to Freemasonry. Of course, the Noahchite legend eventually succumbed to the Hiramic one, but I found it interesting that the earlier masons used Noah as an attempt to create an older lineage.
References
Colavito, Jason (2015). Tubal Cain and the Musical Pillars of Wisdom. Albany, New York. De Hoyos, Arturo (2007). The Scottish Rite Ritual Monitor and Guide. The Supreme Council, 33°, Southern Jurisdiction. Washington, D.C. Eddie, A.R. (2014). Two Pillars. The Masonic Trowel. Jeffery, R (1990). Noah and Freemasonry. Booval, Queensland. Mackey, Albert G. (1878). Encyclopedia of Freemasonry Vol. II. Philadelphia: Moss & Company. Madhavan, Chakravarthy Sampath (2012). The Hiramic Legend: Whence & Wherefore. Grand Lodge of India.
Diana Ketterman is a researcher into the Noahide Laws and has written a new book about them- "Truth is Not of This World". Stew Peters interviewed her on the Noahide Laws recently. The interview is below:
Stew Peters hosts show on Diana Ketterman's new book on the Noahide Laws "Truth is Not of This World"
Some Jews have already stated that Argentinian President Javier Milei has publically come out as a Noahide (here). Here, the Argentinian news site Mdzol claims that Milei has a Noahide background. Where there is smoke there is fire.
The mysterious relationship between Javier Milei and religion in the face of a possible trip by the Pope
Javier Milei, a president with little public past and a relationship with religion that raises questions amid trips to "The Rebbe's Tomb" and a possible arrival of the pope in the country in 2024.
Javier MileiThe president-elect's recent visit to the tomb of the "Lubavitcher Rebbe"Photo: NA
The figure of Javier Milei continues to arouse doubts and curiosity. Being an economic technician, he came to public life with a role as a television columnist, quickly leading to political life, reaching a seat as a national deputy for the City of Buenos Aires and now, president-elect of the Nation.
Among so many doubts, his relationship with religion is added. While a few years ago he declared himself a Catholic who knelt "every morning before a Jew," he later declared to the press that he would become the first Jewish president in Argentine history. In this way, he would be the second head of state belonging to another religion.
Carlos Menem, of Muslim origin, was baptized in the Catholic faith only because the candidacy for the Presidency demanded it until the 1994 reform that he himself promoted. A similar situation happened to the French king Henry IV of Bourbon, who is credited with the phrase "Paris is well worth a mass", which he would have coined after winning the War of Religion in France (in the context of the Counter-Reformation), when he was forced to abjure (retract a heresy) as part of the agreement he reached with the Church to end the war and take over as king.
The case of Javier Milei is, a priori, different. Born into a Catholic family, the Argentinean president-elect has shown signs of being facing a process of conversion to Judaism, a process carried out by the hand of his spiritual guide, Rabbi Shimon Axel Wahnish, of the Latin Israelite Civil Association of Buenos Aires, of the Jewish-Moroccan community in Argentina. This collectivity, in fact, is formed within Hasidic Judaism, typical of Jewish Orthodoxy.
Both the cases of Menem and Milei seem to respond to a syncretic movement, far from the political expediency chosen by that distant French king. This phenomenon is much more common than one might imagine and even, in many cases, it is also a tool of Christianity to get closer to certain communities. This consists of a kind of "mixture" of beliefs without betraying dogmas, but which also has a lot of resistance in more conservative sectors of Christianity. At the same time, syncretic faith is very common in our country, with elements of popular or indigenous beliefs that coexist with Christianity in the faith of a single person.
Javier Milei was trained within the Hasidic movement, typical of Jewish orthodoxy. Photo: X by Javier Milei.
Another faith that appears in Milei's history is Noahism together with Kabbalah, currents of Judaism that appeal not only to the Law of Moses (the Commandments), but also to the Law of Noah (Noahism, from "Noahide" or "Bnei Noach"), "promulgated" after the covenant between God and men recounted in the book of Genesis. This law establishes seven precepts: "Do not worship idols, do not blaspheme, do not commit sins of a sexual nature, do not steal, do not murder, do not eat the flesh of a live animal and establish courts of justice to implement the fulfillment of said laws."
Javier Milei's Faith and Economic Ideology
It is also worth understanding that Javier Milei's position on Judaism goes hand in hand with an ideological position, since liberal doctrine accompanies the precepts of Judaism in many aspects. An example of this is private property, defended in the Law of Moses ("Thou shalt not steal" and "Thou shalt not covet the goods of others. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's house; thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife, nor his male servant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor anything that is thy neighbor's"), charity, which Maimonides (medieval rabbi) cataloged at its highest point as getting employment for the needy, the limited State, understanding that the ruler must submit to the law like every individual, or the accumulation of capital seen as a divine blessing, something that can be contrasted with visions of the Social Doctrine of the Church.
In addition, at the height of nineteenth-century liberalism, the Church branded liberalism as heresy, which led to the creation of the encyclical "Rerum novarum" by Pope Leo XIII in 1891. There, in the face of the growth of the movement inspired by thinkers such as Thomas Hobbes, John Lock and Adam Smith, the Supreme Pontiff values capitalism as a valid movement, but one that requires a certain state intervention, proposing a distributist capitalism that allows the avoidance of monopolies and gives rise to the defense of labor rights.
Another document that nourished the Social Doctrine of the Church was the encyclical "Quadragesimo anno" of Pius XI, which added the "principle of solidarity", in the same sense as the charity proposed by Maimonides but with a different approach from welfare: "Since it is not possible to take from individuals and give to the community what they can achieve with their own effort and industry, Neither is it just, constituting a grave injury and disturbance of right order, to take from lesser and inferior communities what they can do and provide, and to give it to a greater and higher society, since every action of society, by its own strength and nature, must render assistance to the members of the social body. but not to destroy and absorb them."
At the same time, the encyclical of Saint John Paul II "Centesimus Annus", on the occasion of the hundredth anniversary of the publication of "Rerum novarum", revises certain aspects in order to bring them up to date with the times. In it, the pontiff, who was a fundamental piece in the fight against the Warsaw Pact, says that his letter "seeks to highlight the fruitfulness of the principles expressed by Leo XIII, which belong to the doctrinal patrimony of the Church and, therefore, imply the authority of the Magisterium. But pastoral concern has also moved me to propose an analysis of some events in recent history. It is superfluous to emphasize that careful consideration of the course of events, in order to discern the new demands of evangelization, is part of the duty of pastors."
The link between Javier Milei and the Catholic Church
Beyond the religion professed by a head of state, the relationship with the papacy and, consequently, with Vatican City is one of the most important points of diplomacy. So much so that the Holy See has diplomatic missions in countries that are confessional of other faiths, such as Iran, Israel, Thailand or the United Kingdom itself, where Islam, Judaism, Buddhism and Anglicanism are officially professed, respectively.
In this context of diplomatic relations, there was a great controversy around the relationship between Pope Francis and Javier Milei. Such was the preponderance that this issue took, that Sergio Massa himself made it part of his unsuccessful campaign for the presidency, keeping the expectation for a possible visit of the Supreme Pontiff to our country. If so, Francis would make his third papal visit to Argentina – the first of his papacy – after the apostolic trips of John Paul II in 1982 and 1987.
Years ago, Javier Milei himself declared in 2020 to the Argentine press that the Pope was an "imbecile" and the "representation of evil on Earth," something he deepened this year in an interview with Fox News, expressing that Francis "has an affinity for murderous communists."
Pope Francis has already been invited by the president and it is rumored that he will finally visit Argentina for the first time since his inauguration. Photo: NYT
These statements were not only factors that offended Jorge Bergoglio, but also the Catholic Church, one of the main institutions in the world, with millions of faithful in Argentina. To these sayings, were added the comments of the economist close to Milei, Alberto Benegas Lynch (Jr.) who declared: "Out of consideration and respect for my Catholic religion, I believe that we should imitate what President Roca did and suspend diplomatic relations with the Vatican while the totalitarian spirit prevails there."
In turn, Pope Francis was also very critical of Javier Milei in statements to the press in which he expressed his hope that the libertarian does not end up becoming an "Adolfito", in relation to the German dictator between 1933 and 1945 who carried out the Jewish holocaust in all the territory he conquered during World War II.
Despite this, hours after the triumph in the second round, Javier Milei received a call from Pope Francis to congratulate him, to which the libertarian responded with an invitation to visit the country, a commitment that the Holy Father plans to materialize towards the end of April, a time when the Jewish community will be celebrating Passover. according to information accessed by MDZ from the close environment of the bishop of Rome.
The event will be of great importance for the country, as were the visits of John Paul II in order to pacify during the Falklands War and for World Youth Day in 1987. At the same time, there will be tension around the meeting between Javier Milei and Francis, whom the president-elect promised to receive with all the honors of head of state and religious leader.
